Swans S200A Multimedia Speakers
- Product Name: S200A
- Manufacturer: Swans
- Distributor: HiVi
- Performance Rating:
- Value Rating:
- Review Date: February 14, 2007 11:02
- MSRP: $ 679 (Internet-direct - $499)
Speakers:
System
series: HiVi Active Studio Monitor / High-End Multimedia
System type:
Active 4th-order 2-way vented-box system
Driver
configuration:
- woofer: Shielded 5.25” Polycone Midwoofer
- tweeter: 28mm Danish-Style Soft Dome Tweeter
Frequency
range: 47Hz-20kHz(-6dB)
Horizontal
dispersion: 15deg in 250Hz-8000Hz< ±4dB
Vertical
dispersion: 5deg in 250Hz-8000Hz< ±4dB
Harmonic
distortion: 100Hz-20kHz≤1%(2.83V/1m)
Amplifier system:
Frequency
range: 20Hz-20kHz(-3dB,-0.5dB)
Rated
power: 32W×2(5Ω,1kHz,THD<0.1%)
Signal-to-noise: >86dB
Distortion: THD<0.06%(8Ω,1kHz,10W)
Input
sensitivity: 700mV
Input
impedance: 22kΩ
Bass
adjust: ±3dB(100Hz)
Treble
adjust: ±3dB(10kHz)
Separation: >65dB
Finish: Piano Merlot/black mesh; Piano Black
available
Dimension: 195×246×363(mm)
Net
weight: 8.4Kg(main box)/
6.7Kg(subsidiary box)
Pros
- Aesthetics
- Excellent imaging
- Great bass
- Easy setup
- Fully shielded
Cons
- Large
- No headphone jack for defeating speakers (VOIP, etc)
Swans S200A Build Quality and Setup
It wasn’t so long ago that I was researching my first “real” set of speakers. At the time, there were a number of brands that caught my attention. Swans was one of them. But by the time I was ready to buy, they had kind of fallen off the radar and I ended up with another Internet direct brand. When I saw them at CEDIA last year, I noticed one of our reviews for a different product printed up and sitting on their desk (apparently one of their staff picked it up at another booth) I pointed at it and said, “That’s us.” Well, one thing led to another and now I’m looking at a set of their “hi-end” multimedia speakers.
Build Quality
The Swans S200As came packaged fairly well, single-boxed with styrofoam end caps and wrapped in a white cotton drawstring bag. The piano black finish, while extremely well done, doesn’t exactly love the white cotton so much. I ended up having to grab a black cloth and wiping off a bunch of lint. A black bag would have been much preferred. The oval shape is designed to reduce cabinet resonance.
Along with volume, there is also a treble and bass control.
There are no markings on the dials save a small dimple indicating where the
potentiometers are set. The dials go from about 7
to 5 o’clock. The bass control was a little scratchy at the low end
(meaning the dial felt as if it were dirty). The back of the amp has both RCA
and balanced inputs, a pair of speaker outputs for the other speaker, an on/off
switch, a permanently attached power cable (which seems at odds with balanced
inputs to me), and an inch and a half wide port. The amp casing is a very
attractive black brushed aluminum. The enclosure is constructed out of 5/8” mdf
and there is no bracing. The electronics are attached to the back plate as well
as both the sidewalls on glued on wooden braces.
The woofer/tweeter configuration is a little different with the woofer mounted above the tweeter. This has the odd effect of having the tweeter only at ear level if you raise the speaker up about 8 inches or if you lean back in your chair. The finish on these speakers are a gorgeous hand-rubbed piano black. There is also a reddish option called “piano scarlet.” The speakers have very thin rubber pads on the bottom which provide a good, solid connection to any desktop.
Supplier’s Note: Why HiVi Chose the Driver Configuration of the S200A’s – courtesy OZ Home Theater
There are actually several reasons for S200’s unique design:
- Because the S200’s are heavily used as multimedia products, these speakers are rarely stand-mounted in a traditional listening environment. In 90% of the installations our customers have described, the S200’s are sitting lower than average (from a picnic table to a computer desk). As a result – raising the 5.25” midbass woofer up off the underlying surface significantly tightens the midbass response and eliminates midrange bloat to achieve a more natural presentation (something that’s readily apparent in female vocals).
- An added benefit to the woofer placement in the S200 is a natural (i.e. physical) time alignment that results from the added distance from ear level to tweeter level (vs. ear level to woofer level). Due to the near-field listening application that is often utilized in the S200’s, this trait significantly strengthens the S200’s 2-channel image width and perceived depth (and does not affect the tweeter’s overall response due to the high dispersion characteristics of the silk-dome used in this application).
- The inverse mounting arrangement in the S200’s also has a nice aesthetic appeal. In combination with the solid aluminum bezel utilized on the front baffle of the S200, this arrangement results in a very contemporary and almost cosmopolitan-like feel from the S200’s…something that tends to help out in the WAF appeal. This is more of a personal observation than an actual design cue…in my opinion; the unique arrangement gives the S200 a sculpted look that is a refreshing change from the cookie-cutter mold of multimedia products.
Setup
Setting up the Swans S200A’s is fairly straightforward. If you have RCA outs on your soundcard, you can connect those directly to the amp. If not, there is a 3.5mm to RCA converter included. The RCA cables included with the speakers are pretty cheap (think DVD player included cables) so you might want to upgrade. The speaker terminals on the back of the amp are very nice and the unterminated speaker cable is more than adequate for the short run you’ll probably need. As with every other multimedia speaker set I’ve ever used, the one with the volume control is set up as the right channel. There is a little blue led that shines through the speaker grill on the right channel when the speakers have power.
I set the speakers on a set of stands that I have flanking my desk (mostly because there is just way too much stuff up there with two monitors, a printer, a modem, a router, and various and sundry office supplies). This separated the speakers by about 6 feet. I pointed each of them at my listening position (i.e. chair) which actually has the front baffle of the speaker hovering about an inch above the desktop. Since there is no “bass module” as you may be used to with the freebie speakers that seem to come with every new computer purchase these days, you won’t have to give up valuable leg stretching space under the desk. There is a little valley along the top that I absolutely LOVE… why? Can you guess? It makes setting up the speakers a snap. It is practically an aiming sight!
Swans S200A Listening Tests and Conclusion
I was worried at first about how the imaging and soundstage would be affect by the vast separation of the speakers. These are meant to be on a desk, one presumes flanking a monitor. Luckily, my fears were in vain. I found the imaging to be very good. Even as I moved around normally (leaning forward, back, etc.), the soundstage never collapsed and the imaging was always rock solid. The other real issue that immediately came to mind was, of course, the bass response. In order to get a more accurate idea of what was useable, I popped in my Rives Test CD2. In researching for this review, I’ve read a number of different “low” figures – 100hz, 55hz, 50hz, and 47hz (which is what is on the Swans website so I included it in the specs). I played the test tones in the background and looked up when I noticed a sound. I couldn’t believe it but I heard real bass as low as 50hz! There was a barely audible sound at 40hz but at 50hz I would say it was usable! Very impressive for speakers of this size.
But that doesn’t give you an idea of how they sound. For that, I’ll actually have to use the speakers.
Rives Audio Test CD2
Since I was running frequency sweeps anyhow, I went ahead and let the Rives Test CD2 play. There are quite a few tracks after the test tones that aren’t full songs but do give you a number of minutes of higher quality recording to check out your speakers. There’s a good mix of bass (of the standup bass guitar type), bells and chimes, and everything in between. Also, the tracks are chosen to highlight your speaker’s ability to image and present a coherent soundstage.
I really shouldn’t have been worried about these speakers imaging. Even in an untreated office (who has a “treated” office anyways?) with non-optimal placement, these little speakers constantly had me believing that the vocals were coming out of my monitor. Vocals were well located, instruments and sound effects found consistent and stable locations within the soundstage, and overall, everything sounded very lifelike. The bass was tight and controlled though the midrange did seem to get a bit sloppy at times (this may be a room issue). The highs were very well presented and the chimes and bells had that perfect metallic ring and holdover that I hear so often around here when my nine month old gets into the pots and pans… except not as painful… and loud… and annoying.
CD: Yello – the eye
I wasn’t going to talk about this album on yet another review, but I had to bring up one quick point. As I’ve mentioned, Track 5 – Junior B has a bass run that I like to use to test larger speakers and subs. I played his track on a whim and apparently it must start at about 50 Hz and work its way down. I heard the first note and then it quickly faded off. What was impressive was what I didn’t hear – I didn’t hear bottoming out (no matter how loud I turned it) and I didn’t hear port chuffing. Now, when I turned the volume on the computer, the speaker, and the bass control all the way up, there was a bit of chuffing and buzzing, but it was inaudible from my seated potion (about 3-4 feet away). I literally had to get up and put my head behind the speaker to hear it.
Once again, I wondered how these speakers would perform if I didn’t toe them in so heavily. Taking the opposite extreme, I pointed the speakers straight forward and played Track 14 Planet Dada (Flamboyant). I was amazed to find that, for the most part, the sound was unaffected. The highs were a bit muted and the mids seemed a bit more recessed but the imaging was nearly as good as the toed in configuration. These speakers seem extremely resistant to poor placement. Now standing up did make a big (detrimental) difference in the sound quality destroying the imaging and almost muting the highs... so, stay seated.
Bang & Olufsen Vol. XIII – The Sound of Perfection
During my visit with Bang & Olufsen, they handed out a demo CD for all the attendees. While it is all pretty high quality recordings, most of it is either boring, weird or, well, classical. The first track, however, has quickly become one of my favorite test songs. Bruce Guthro’s “Beautiful Life” has a great mix of male vocals and piano. The track has an extremely low noise floor and lots of airy passages. The Swans S200A’s did a good job of recreating this track complete with plenty of depth from the piano and a very rich presentation of the vocals. The fourth track on the CD, Maggie Reilly’s “Close Your Eyes”, starts off with an a capella female vocal with plenty of echo and a very high recording quality. By the time the acoustic guitar comes in (which is like 8 bars into the track), you’re already engrossed. The Swans did a very nice job indeed.
One last point that needs to be mentioned is that the bass wasn’t at all boomy. With the separate bass modules, I almost always found that I could hear more bass outside the room than in. This has the dubious effect of having the wife come in and ask me to turn it down when I’m listening at (what I believe to be) reasonable volume levels. With the Swans S200A’s, the bass stayed in the room where it belonged. This means that I can almost turn the volume up twice as loud without having my wife complain! This alone is worth the price of admission.
Conclusions and Overall Perceptions
When I saw the Swans S200A speakers at CEDIA, I didn’t know what to think. Oval shaped, woofer mounted above the tweeter, piano gloss finish… Can there really be hi-end computer speakers? Apparently, the answer to that question is a resounding ‘yes’. These are by far the best computer speakers I’ve ever heard. They are also the most expensive I’ve ever heard. Even when compared to a separate amp and a set of bookshelves they hold their own well. They have a good amount of bass, a pleasant sound, and fantastic fit and finish. Some are going to balk at their size as they demand a bit of desk real estate. Personally, I found that these speakers were fairly placement-forgiving so you should have no problem integrating them into almost any setup.
Swans S200A Multimedia Speakers
MSRP: $679
Made by:
HiVi, Inc.; Hong Kong
US Importer:
The Audio Insider
Reno NV
800-992-7252
www.theaudioinsider.com
Special thanks to OZ Home Theater for providing the samples for this review.
About HiVi
HiVi is a leading manufacturer of stereophile quality audio systems. Employing some of the worlds’ finest electro-acoustical technicians and craftsmen, the company established state-of-the art R+D facilities in Toronto, Canada in 1994 and was fueled by early successes with innovative driver designs. In 1997, HiVi merged with highly-regarded speaker manufacturer Swans Speaker Systems and opened corporate offices in Monterey Park, California. Respected audio designer Frank Hale, former president of Swans, continues to serve today as Chief Designer for HiVi Speaker Systems.
The Score Card
The scoring below is based on each piece of equipment doing the duty it is designed for. The numbers are weighed heavily with respect to the individual cost of each unit, thus giving a rating roughly equal to:
Performance × Price Factor/Value = Rating
Audioholics.com note: The ratings indicated below are based on subjective listening and objective testing of the product in question. The rating scale is based on performance/value ratio. If you notice better performing products in future reviews that have lower numbers in certain areas, be aware that the value factor is most likely the culprit. Other Audioholics reviewers may rate products solely based on performance, and each reviewer has his/her own system for ratings.
Audioholics Rating Scale
- — Excellent
- — Very Good
- — Good
- — Fair
- — Poor
Metric | Rating |
---|---|
Build Quality | |
Appearance | |
Treble Extension | |
Treble Smoothness | |
Midrange Accuracy | |
Bass Extension | |
Bass Accuracy | |
Imaging | |
Soundstage | |
Dynamic Range | |
Performance | |
Value |